Future of 5G Core – Putting it in Numbers

 


What does the future portend for 5G Core?

In our previous blog, we examined the barriers to 5G acceptance. We will now see how the numbers stack up for 5GC vis-à-vis EPC.

Figure below is excerpted from our latest report Virtual Core – Gateway to the “Real 5G”.

The figure shows the market share progression during 2021-2026 for EPC and 5GC.

 

Market Share Progression for the Overall Virtualized Core; by Generation 2021-2026 (%)

 

As 5G radios increasingly become the norm, the terms EPC and 5G Core will be used interchangeably with the NSA and SA modes. Expectedly, the market for 5G core will outpace the EPC market. The most obvious barrier for 5G core acceptance is pricing. Reportedly, for a comparable user base, the 5G core is costlier by a substantial factor with premium estimates ranging from 50% upward. This is a compellingly steep barrier for many carriers whose ROI from 4G EPC is unfulfilled to date. 4G EPC is also able to address the most immediate user experience enhancement in the form of throughput amplification to a great degree of effectiveness when coupled with 5G radios. The obvious lacuna in EPC is its limitation in serving the uRLLC and MMTC 5G use-cases.

 

 

Each of the above ingredients results in a network slicing use-case. 5GC is naturally tailored for this scenario. The pull of the use-cases will ultimately prevail over the obstacles posed by pricing challenges, making 5GC the mainstream core methodology.

For more insights about the 5GC market, check with us on out latest report Virtual Core – Gateway to the “Real 5G”.

 

Published on: August 19, 2022

 
Kaustubha Parkhi
Principal Analyst, Insight Research
 

 

RELATED BLOGS

The “Big O” in the NFVO… and the MANO

      Let us address some existential issues. What is NFVO, or VNFO for that matter, after all? Is it the same as MANO? In the strictest of senses, MANO has a different connotation – a more inclusive one. MANO in its purest sense combines the NFVO, the VNFM and the VIM. Thus, the … Continue reading The “Big O” in the NFVO… and the MANO

Microservices – The wind beneath the CNF wings

        In my last post, I discussed the pitfalls of microservices, which power CNFs. In this post, I will present the other side of the story. We know that microservices dissect individual CNFs into a mesh of interdependent services that can be containerized independently of each other. I would like you to … Continue reading Microservices – The wind beneath the CNF wings

Are CNFs, VNFs?

      The answer is yes. Our recent report “The VNFO – Ripe for Change” says this loudly and clearly. Pardon the atrocious image. But I hope it encapsulates the dilemma appropriately. It is important to reiterate the reasons for including containers under VNF and in essence, Kubernetes under VNFO. Both VMs and containers … Continue reading Are CNFs, VNFs?

Select your currency
USD United States (US) dollar